Vasily Grosaman and Andrey Platonov

Among his contemporaries there was only one writer whom Grossman admired without reservation: Andrey Platonov. Fyodor Guber, Yekaterina Korotkova and Semyon Lipkin have all written about the close friendship between the two writers and their admiration of each other’s work. Platonov was six years older than Grossman, but Grossman was the more established figure and he clearly did what he could to help Platonov; in 1942 he asked David Ortenberg, the chief editor of Red Star, to take Platonov under his protection, saying that ‘this good writer’ was ‘defenceless’ and ‘without any settled position’. Ortenberg duly took Platonov on as a war correspondent. Later Grossman invited Platonov to collaborate on The Black Book; it seems that Platonov was given responsibility for all the material relating to the Minsk ghetto. During Platonov’s final illness, Grossman visited him almost daily, and he gave one of the main speeches at Platonov’s funeral. In a 1960 radio broadcast based on this speech, Grossman described Platonov as ‘a writer who wanted to understand the most complicated – which really means the most simple – foundations of human existence.’ Lipkin refers to this broadcast as ‘the first sensible and worthwhile word said in Russia about Platonov.’ In some respects Grossman and Platonov stand at opposite ends of the spectrum. Platonov’s prose is often close to poetry whereas Grossman’s is often close to journalism – perhaps as close to journalism as great prose can be while remaining great prose. Nevertheless, the two writers evidently had a great deal in common. Ortenberg, for example, writes in his memoirs, ‘Grossman, like his friend Andrey Platonov, was not a talkative person. The two of them sometimes came to Red Star, settled on one of the sofas […] and stay there for an entire hour without saying a word. They seemed, without words, to be carrying on a conversation known only to them.’ Lipkin, for his part, describes Platonov as ‘more independent in his judgments’ and Grossman as a ‘more traditional’ writer. He goes on to relate how he used to sit with Platonov and Grossman on the street opposite Platonov’s apartment. The three of them would take turns in making up stories about passers-by. Grossman’s were detailed and realistic; Platonov’s were ‘plotless’, more focussed on the person’s inner life, which was ‘both unusual and simple, like the life of a plant.’ Still more interesting, however, is the extent to which Grossman, throughout the period from Platonov’s death in 1951 to his own death in 1964, seems to have grown more like Platonov. It is almost as if he felt Platonov’s spirit to be something so precious that he wanted to keep it alive. ‘The Dog’ is about a mongrel by the name of ‘Pestrushka’ – the first living creature to survive a journey in space. With her capacity for devotion, her past life as a homeless wanderer, living out on the streets, and her quick, instinctive understanding of technology, Pestrushka embodies all the most characteristic qualities of Platonov’s peasant heroes. In another story, ‘The Road’, Grossman almost outdoes Platonov. Platonov often shows us uneducated people grappling with difficult philosophical questions; Grossman, however, presents us with a mule who arrives at the concept of infinity and successfully resolves Hamlet’s dilemma about whether to be or not to be. ...


Popular posts from this blog

Solzhenitsyn’s cathedrals

Svetlana Alexievich: ‘After communism we thought everything would be fine. But people don’t understand freedom’

Darkness of a drawer - Mikhail Bulgakov